Triple
T28611096
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | QMP |
E724168
|
entity |
| Predicate | commandFormat |
P37198
|
FINISHED |
| Object | JSON object with "execute" and "arguments" fields |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: JSON object with "execute" and "arguments" fields | Statement: [QMP, commandFormat, JSON object with "execute" and "arguments" fields]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commandFormat Context triple: [QMP, commandFormat, JSON object with "execute" and "arguments" fields]
-
A.
commandInputFormat
chosen
Indicates the expected structure or syntax that a command must follow when being provided as input.
-
B.
commandStyle
Indicates the manner or approach in which one entity issues commands or directives to another.
-
C.
commandSyntax
Indicates the specific structure or format in which a command must be written or expressed.
-
D.
commandName
Indicates the specific label or identifier used to denote a particular command within a system or interface.
-
E.
commandType
Indicates the specific kind or category of command being issued or executed in the relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d816d7c8190a1fe27e3434041dc |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6c49627908190b3553474c7c3072b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6c3f23ae081909a52801266063a3c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:30 a.m.