Triple
T28609090
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | WinFsp |
E724127
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | filesystem development kit |
C54305
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: filesystem development kit Context triple: [WinFsp, instanceOf, filesystem development kit]
-
A.
flash-friendly file system
A flash-friendly file system is a storage management system designed to optimize performance, wear leveling, and reliability on flash memory devices by minimizing random writes and efficiently handling erase-block constraints.
-
B.
FAT file system
A FAT file system is a simple, widely supported disk file system that organizes and manages files using a File Allocation Table to track the location and allocation status of data clusters on storage media.
-
C.
Unix file system
A Unix file system is a hierarchical, tree-structured organization of files and directories that manages how data is stored, named, accessed, and protected on Unix-based operating systems.
-
D.
Linux file system developer
A Linux file system developer designs, implements, optimizes, and maintains file system components and related kernel subsystems to ensure efficient, reliable, and secure data storage and access on Linux-based systems.
-
E.
FAT file system variant
A FAT file system variant is a specific implementation or extension of the File Allocation Table architecture that defines how data is organized, stored, and managed on storage media, often differing in cluster size limits, maximum volume and file sizes, and supported features.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d816d7c8190a1fe27e3434041dc |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:29 a.m.