Triple

T28608091
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject R3000 E724105 entity
Predicate hasCoprocessorInterface P201180 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [R3000, hasCoprocessorInterface, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCoprocessorInterface
Context triple: [R3000, hasCoprocessorInterface, yes]
  • A. hasInterface
    Indicates that one entity provides, exposes, or is connected through a defined interface to another entity.
  • B. hasSuperInterface
    Indicates that one interface is declared to extend or inherit from another interface, making the latter a superinterface of the former.
  • C. hasInterfaceElement
    Indicates that one entity includes, exposes, or is associated with a specific interface element as part of its user interface or interaction surface.
  • D. hasExpansionInterface
    Indicates that an entity provides or supports an interface through which it can be expanded or extended with additional components or functionality.
  • E. hasPrimaryInterface
    Indicates that an entity is associated with its main or default interface used for interaction or communication.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01d816d7c8190a1fe27e3434041dc completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffdd05d1908190957deb11392f4595 completed May 10, 2026, 1:19 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffdc0d33c881908b3483bee8a96540 completed May 10, 2026, 1:14 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ffdd0486e08190a0f2ff4ce0aee13b completed May 10, 2026, 1:19 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:28 a.m.