Triple
T28601125
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kingdom of Great Britain (Jacobite claim) |
E723912
|
entity |
| Predicate | successorInTheory |
P194245
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jacobite succession |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jacobite succession | Statement: [Kingdom of Great Britain (Jacobite claim), successorInTheory, Jacobite succession]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorInTheory Context triple: [Kingdom of Great Britain (Jacobite claim), successorInTheory, Jacobite succession]
-
A.
successorInPractice
Indicates that one entity has taken over the role, position, or function of another in actual practice, even if not formally or officially designated as its successor.
-
B.
successor
Indicates that one entity directly follows another in an ordered sequence or position.
-
C.
successorHypothesis
Indicates that one hypothesis directly follows and builds upon another in a sequence of related hypotheses.
-
D.
successorDeterminedBy
Indicates that the identity of a successor is established or chosen according to a specified rule, process, or determining factor.
-
E.
successorInIdea
Indicates that one idea conceptually follows, develops from, or replaces another in a sequence of intellectual progression.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d80b1908190980594837604b8c7 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd68abf52881909c5a390c362b7c59 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd6812d0c88190930d8fa2d4b92490 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:35 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd68ab21a0819096bfc4a8c14851ad |
completed | May 8, 2026, 4:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:24 a.m.