Triple

T28588758
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Amaralingeswara Swamy Temple E723581 entity
Predicate hasSacredLingam P80427 FINISHED
Object Amaralingeswara lingam NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Amaralingeswara lingam | Statement: [Amaralingeswara Swamy Temple, hasSacredLingam, Amaralingeswara lingam]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSacredLingam
Context triple: [Amaralingeswara Swamy Temple, hasSacredLingam, Amaralingeswara lingam]
  • A. hasSacredSymbol
    Indicates that one entity serves as a sacred or religiously significant symbol associated with another entity.
  • B. hasSacredImage
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with an image regarded as sacred or religiously significant.
  • C. hasSacredWeapon
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a weapon regarded as holy, consecrated, or religiously significant.
  • D. hasLinga chosen
    Indicates a relationship where an entity possesses or is associated with a linga (a symbolic representation, typically of Shiva).
  • E. hasSacredNumber
    Indicates that a particular number is regarded as sacred, holy, or spiritually significant in relation to an entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01d7f92e481909847f5f3f3174a89 completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6c1265c208190aacd2b551f8f0f82 completed May 3, 2026, 3:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6bd2415fc81908c23c311aebce66f completed May 3, 2026, 3:12 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:19 a.m.