Triple
T28580663
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2009 New Orleans Saints season |
E723364
|
entity |
| Predicate | advancedToSuperBowl |
P166489
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Super Bowl XLIV |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Super Bowl XLIV | Statement: [2009 New Orleans Saints season, advancedToSuperBowl, Super Bowl XLIV]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: advancedToSuperBowl Context triple: [2009 New Orleans Saints season, advancedToSuperBowl, Super Bowl XLIV]
-
A.
ledTeamToSuperBowl
Indicates that a person, acting as a team leader (such as a head coach or quarterback), guided their team to reach the Super Bowl game.
-
B.
wonSuperBowlAs
Indicates that one entity achieved victory in a Super Bowl in the specified role, position, or capacity associated with the other entity.
-
C.
appearedInSuperBowl
Indicates that the entity participated as a player, coach, or key contributor in at least one Super Bowl game.
-
D.
wonSuperBowlWith
Indicates that one entity (typically a player, coach, or team member) achieved a Super Bowl victory while being part of a specific team.
-
E.
selectedToProBowl
Indicates that an athlete has been chosen to participate in the Pro Bowl all-star game.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d7e97708190ae9e77ee66a68abd |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6622808b48190bbabcc75288ab031 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f660f082508190a95a7888ad66cb2e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:39 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6617a7e7c81908cfac4a2250797ee |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:14 a.m.