Triple

T28567130
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cinnamon E722710 entity
Predicate sometimesSeenWith P22648 FINISHED
Object Bernadette Rostenkowski-Wolowitz NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bernadette Rostenkowski-Wolowitz | Statement: [Cinnamon, sometimesSeenWith, Bernadette Rostenkowski-Wolowitz]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sometimesSeenWith
Context triple: [Cinnamon, sometimesSeenWith, Bernadette Rostenkowski-Wolowitz]
  • A. canBeSeenWith chosen
    Indicates that two entities are observable together in the same context, setting, or time.
  • B. usedWith
    Indicates that one entity is typically or appropriately employed together with another entity in a combined or complementary use.
  • C. associatedWithSee
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is contextually or functionally linked to another through the act or concept of seeing or visual observation.
  • D. notablyUsedWith
    Indicates that one entity is commonly or prominently used together with another entity, in a way that is especially characteristic or noteworthy.
  • E. alsoUsedIn
    Indicates that something is additionally employed, applied, or present in another context, setting, or use case beyond the primary one.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01a5f69d08190ad5c0d2167078dec completed April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6508f9be0819094d2968611578175 completed May 2, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f64cb0d8008190912e1430cfaf92aa completed May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:07 a.m.