Triple
T28549028
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | "Let's Celebrate!" |
E722827
|
entity |
| Predicate | communicativeIntent |
P88492
|
FINISHED |
| Object | to share joy with others |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: to share joy with others | Statement: ["Let's Celebrate!", communicativeIntent, to share joy with others]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: communicativeIntent Context triple: ["Let's Celebrate!", communicativeIntent, to share joy with others]
-
A.
communicationTrait
Indicates a characteristic or quality related to how an entity communicates or engages in communication.
-
B.
intendedMessage
Indicates that one entity is the message or content that another entity aims or plans to communicate.
-
C.
intendsTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the purpose, plan, or desire to perform an action involving another entity or outcome.
-
D.
intendedWith
Indicates that one entity is the planned or desired target, recipient, or context for the use or application of another entity.
-
E.
communicationDirection
Indicates the directional flow of a communication act, specifying who is sending information and who is receiving it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01a60204481909af1bb76247b8221 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f66d7765208190b87b1cc6d96a151c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f66abfdaf08190a55f14c70be6fd4d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:41 a.m.