Triple
T28537990
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Matmid points |
E722219
|
entity |
| Predicate | areManagedThrough |
P98727
|
FINISHED |
| Object | EL AL website |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: EL AL website | Statement: [Matmid points, areManagedThrough, EL AL website]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: areManagedThrough Context triple: [Matmid points, areManagedThrough, EL AL website]
-
A.
isManagedThrough
chosen
Indicates that one entity is administered, controlled, or operated by means of another entity, typically specifying the mechanism, channel, or system used for its management.
-
B.
isManagedWith
Indicates that one entity is administered, controlled, or operated using another entity as the managing tool, method, or resource.
-
C.
isManagedFor
Indicates that one entity is administered, overseen, or controlled on behalf of another entity or purpose.
-
D.
managedIn
Indicates that one entity is administered, operated, or overseen within the scope, control, or jurisdiction of another entity.
-
E.
isOftenManagedBy
Indicates that an entity is frequently or typically overseen, directed, or administered by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01a5e42348190b1ffbca26e739c84 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f64fdc4e2081909ab249c11234a143 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f64cb0d8008190912e1430cfaf92aa |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:33 a.m.