Triple

T28529253
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Minister of Public Safety E721994 entity
Predicate hasAgencyUnderPortfolio P81426 FINISHED
Object Royal Canadian Mounted Police NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Royal Canadian Mounted Police | Statement: [Minister of Public Safety, hasAgencyUnderPortfolio, Royal Canadian Mounted Police]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAgencyUnderPortfolio
Context triple: [Minister of Public Safety, hasAgencyUnderPortfolio, Royal Canadian Mounted Police]
  • A. belongsToAgency chosen
    Indicates that an entity is under the authority, control, or affiliation of a specific agency.
  • B. hasParentAgencyType
    Indicates that an agency is associated with or falls under a parent agency of a specified type.
  • C. hasKeyAgency
    Indicates that an entity serves as the primary responsible or controlling agency for another entity, action, or process.
  • D. hadAgency
    Indicates that an entity actively initiated, controlled, or was responsible for an action or outcome, rather than being a passive participant.
  • E. hasAgencyInPlot
    Indicates that an entity actively influences or drives events within the narrative’s plot.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01a5d7ec88190ada2d5be7c06c35d completed April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f64fd4434c8190a4279c3eb71ed30c completed May 2, 2026, 7:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f64cb0d8008190912e1430cfaf92aa completed May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:27 a.m.