Triple
T28515558
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sir George Bruce of Carnock |
E721604
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWithHistoricCounty |
P152728
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fife |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fife | Statement: [Sir George Bruce of Carnock, associatedWithHistoricCounty, Fife]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithHistoricCounty Context triple: [Sir George Bruce of Carnock, associatedWithHistoricCounty, Fife]
-
A.
hasAssociatedHistoricCounty
chosen
Indicates that an entity is linked to a specific historic county with which it is geographically or administratively associated.
-
B.
historicalCounty
Indicates that an entity was located within or associated with a county as it existed in the past, even if that county’s boundaries or administrative status have since changed.
-
C.
coversHistoricCounty
Indicates that one entity geographically encompasses the area of a historic county.
-
D.
hasHistoricCountyTownRelation
Indicates a relationship where a town serves or has served as the historic county town (traditional administrative center) of a given county.
-
E.
hasHistoricCountyCode
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific historic county, identified by its county code.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01a5c072081908c7b04bcf6478da9 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0174142430819084aa1235500b9d3b |
completed | May 11, 2026, 6:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0171a6e0088190958679bb6cb24a70 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 6:05 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:16 a.m.