Triple

T28509964
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Raphael Mudge E721453 entity
Predicate toolArmitageType P86841 FINISHED
Object graphical cyber attack management tool for Metasploit LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: graphical cyber attack management tool for Metasploit | Statement: [Raphael Mudge, toolArmitageType, graphical cyber attack management tool for Metasploit]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: toolArmitageType
Context triple: [Raphael Mudge, toolArmitageType, graphical cyber attack management tool for Metasploit]
  • A. toolType chosen
    Indicates the specific kind or category of tool associated with an entity.
  • B. attackToolExample
    Indicates that a specific tool or method is used as an example of how an attack is or can be carried out.
  • C. toolIn
    Indicates that one entity is a tool or instrument used in or associated with another entity or context.
  • D. usesToolType
    Indicates that an entity performs an action or fulfills a role by employing a specific type or category of tool.
  • E. toolkitName
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or identified by the name of a specific toolkit.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01a5c072081908c7b04bcf6478da9 completed April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f64f750780819096870b32a7f4b35f completed May 2, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f64cb0d8008190912e1430cfaf92aa completed May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:11 a.m.