Triple

T28508652
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Unix crypt(3) E721424 entity
Predicate originalAlgorithm P25130 FINISHED
Object DES-based password hash LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: DES-based password hash | Statement: [Unix crypt(3), originalAlgorithm, DES-based password hash]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originalAlgorithm
Context triple: [Unix crypt(3), originalAlgorithm, DES-based password hash]
  • A. previousAlgorithm
    Indicates that one algorithm temporally precedes another in a sequence or version history.
  • B. originalFunction
    Indicates that one entity serves as the initial or primary function from which another function or behavior is derived or defined.
  • C. relatedAlgorithm chosen
    Indicates that one algorithm has a meaningful connection or association with another algorithm, such as similarity, dependency, or complementary function.
  • D. originalSample
    Indicates that one entity serves as the initial or source sample from which another related sample or derivative is obtained or based.
  • E. introducesAlgorithm
    Indicates that an entity presents or brings a specific algorithm into use, awareness, or discussion.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01a5c072081908c7b04bcf6478da9 completed April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fee0b2da3c8190a3519d0564f2f32d completed May 9, 2026, 7:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fee05b315c819081dfcbfb15273487 completed May 9, 2026, 7:20 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:11 a.m.