Triple

T28506904
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject security.debian.org E721384 entity
Predicate availabilityGoal P164599 FINISHED
Object high availability LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high availability | Statement: [security.debian.org, availabilityGoal, high availability]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: availabilityGoal
Context triple: [security.debian.org, availabilityGoal, high availability]
  • A. availabilityTarget
    Indicates that something is the intended object, resource, or condition whose availability is being specified, monitored, or constrained.
  • B. availability
    Indicates that an entity is present, accessible, or ready for use or interaction by another entity.
  • C. availabilityPattern
    Indicates a recurring schedule or pattern that defines when something is available or unavailable over time.
  • D. availabilityStatus
    Indicates the current state of whether something is obtainable, usable, or accessible at a given time.
  • E. goalIn
    Indicates that one entity’s objective, aim, or intended outcome is located within, directed toward, or achieved inside another entity or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01a5c072081908c7b04bcf6478da9 completed April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f64f72071081909b841e702846a33b completed May 2, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f64cb0d8008190912e1430cfaf92aa completed May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f64db8ee1881909362701d72ffe282 completed May 2, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:09 a.m.