Triple
T28504868
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | xfce4-power-manager |
E721341
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsPowerFeature |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | display power management |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: display power management | Statement: [xfce4-power-manager, supportsPowerFeature, display power management]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsPowerFeature Context triple: [xfce4-power-manager, supportsPowerFeature, display power management]
-
A.
supportedPower
Indicates that an entity is capable of providing, handling, or operating at a specified level or range of power.
-
B.
powersFeature
Indicates that one entity provides the underlying functionality or capability that enables a particular feature of another entity.
-
C.
supportsPowerLevel
Indicates that one entity is capable of providing or sustaining the required power level for another entity or operation.
-
D.
supportsFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
E.
hasPowerFunction
Indicates that one entity serves as the power function or exponentiation operation applied to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01a5c072081908c7b04bcf6478da9 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00ada2903481908b28ce55ef97a6c2 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00ad5d23788190b3f9e2de761d39bb |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:07 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:08 a.m.