Triple
T28486549
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Persecution and the Art of Writing |
E720844
|
entity |
| Predicate | philosophersDiscussed |
P53153
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Plato |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Plato | Statement: [Persecution and the Art of Writing, philosophersDiscussed, Plato]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: philosophersDiscussed Context triple: [Persecution and the Art of Writing, philosophersDiscussed, Plato]
-
A.
philosophersCovered
chosen
Indicates that certain philosophers are included or addressed within a given work, discussion, or context.
-
B.
notablePhilosopher
Indicates that the subject is recognized as a philosopher of particular significance or influence.
-
C.
workOfPhilosopher
Indicates that the subject is a philosophical work created or authored by the philosopher represented by the object.
-
D.
discussesThinker
Indicates that one entity engages in discussion or analysis about a particular thinker or philosopher.
-
E.
producedPhilosopher
Indicates that one entity (such as a place, institution, or context) brought about, gave rise to, or was responsible for the development of a particular philosopher.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01a5a47148190b0a7e111bc432e0a |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f652a492108190b885b955ce147d3c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f651aad92c8190b874b3b5f9f64434 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:58 a.m.