Triple

T28486408
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject neoconservatism E720841 entity
Predicate hasViewOnHumanRights P176298 FINISHED
Object supports using power to advance human rights selectively LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: supports using power to advance human rights selectively | Statement: [neoconservatism, hasViewOnHumanRights, supports using power to advance human rights selectively]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasViewOnHumanRights
Context triple: [neoconservatism, hasViewOnHumanRights, supports using power to advance human rights selectively]
  • A. viewOnHumanRights chosen
    Indicates that one entity holds a particular stance, opinion, or perspective regarding human rights.
  • B. recognizesHumanRightsThrough
    Indicates that an entity acknowledges, upholds, or implements human rights by means of a specific instrument, mechanism, action, or intermediary.
  • C. stanceOnHumanRightsRecord
    Indicates the position or evaluation an entity holds regarding another entity’s human rights record.
  • D. humanRightsConcern
    Indicates a situation, action, or condition that raises issues related to the recognition, protection, or violation of human rights.
  • E. hasHumanRightsOffice
    Indicates that an entity maintains or is associated with an office responsible for handling human rights issues, policies, or compliance.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01a5a47148190b0a7e111bc432e0a completed April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f707f7959881908f037f0d6b1d0c36 completed May 3, 2026, 8:31 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f700fc274c8190a128593dc7c7abd0 completed May 3, 2026, 8:02 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:58 a.m.