Triple
T28484724
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Micah Sanders |
E720796
|
entity |
| Predicate | canAlter |
P48269
|
FINISHED |
| Object | electronic data |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: electronic data | Statement: [Micah Sanders, canAlter, electronic data]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canAlter Context triple: [Micah Sanders, canAlter, electronic data]
-
A.
canChangeIn
Indicates that one entity is capable of undergoing alteration, transformation, or variation within the context or influence of another entity or condition.
-
B.
canSet
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to assign, configure, or change a property, value, or state of another entity.
-
C.
canChangeAfter
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to alter another entity or its state at some later point in time.
-
D.
canOverrule
Indicates that one entity has the authority or power to reverse, nullify, or supersede the decision or judgment made by another entity.
-
E.
mayAmend
chosen
Indicates that one party has the authority or permission to modify, revise, or change something that already exists.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01a5a47148190b0a7e111bc432e0a |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f64f0efb7c81909689430f9feec052 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f64cb0d8008190912e1430cfaf92aa |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:57 a.m.