Triple

T28470866
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject STS-1 E720431 entity
Predicate supportsConcatenation P192432 FINISHED
Object STS-1c LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: STS-1c | Statement: [STS-1, supportsConcatenation, STS-1c]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsConcatenation
Context triple: [STS-1, supportsConcatenation, STS-1c]
  • A. supportsChaining
    Indicates that one entity enables or allows another entity to be linked in sequence with additional similar entities, forming a chain of operations or relationships.
  • B. designedToCombine chosen
    Indicates that one entity is intentionally created or configured to be merged, integrated, or used together with another entity.
  • C. canBeAugmentedWith
    Indicates that one entity is capable of being enhanced, expanded, or supplemented by another entity.
  • D. canMerge
    Indicates that two or more entities are compatible in such a way that they can be combined into a single unified entity or structure.
  • E. supportsConjunctConsonants
    Indicates that a writing system or orthographic convention allows the formation and use of conjunct consonant clusters (combined consonant characters).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01a5983f48190b7c1b8857245a4f7 completed April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a00ab25c5b48190ad07ff508392ef56 completed May 10, 2026, 3:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a00a8a5cfc48190bbe97fb2bbd1b947 completed May 10, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:48 a.m.