Triple
T28467844
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | S Club Juniors |
E720343
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableFormerMemberLaterGroup |
P153740
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Saturdays |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Saturdays | Statement: [S Club Juniors, notableFormerMemberLaterGroup, The Saturdays]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableFormerMemberLaterGroup Context triple: [S Club Juniors, notableFormerMemberLaterGroup, The Saturdays]
-
A.
performerFormerMemberOf
Indicates that a performer was previously a member of a particular group, organization, or ensemble but is no longer affiliated with it.
-
B.
hasArtistFormerGroup
Indicates that an artist was previously a member of a particular group or band.
-
C.
hasNotableFormerGroup
chosen
Indicates that an entity was previously a member of a notable group, organization, or collective.
-
D.
notableBandMember
Indicates that the subject is a member of the band in the object and is recognized as particularly prominent or significant within that band.
-
E.
formerMemberOf
Indicates that an entity once belonged to or was affiliated with a group, organization, or body, but is no longer a member.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01a58a67c819097936d9e8da8d6e6 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a011e5a419081908d06a07b395ebd97 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 12:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a011de119048190b27d361cffabc228 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 12:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m.