Triple
T28455932
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Port of Menteith parish |
E716712
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicCountyJurisdiction |
P11889
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Perthshire |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Perthshire | Statement: [Port of Menteith parish, historicCountyJurisdiction, Perthshire]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicCountyJurisdiction Context triple: [Port of Menteith parish, historicCountyJurisdiction, Perthshire]
-
A.
historicCountyPart
Indicates that one entity forms a constituent part or subdivision of a historic county.
-
B.
historicalJurisdiction
chosen
Indicates that one entity previously held legal or administrative authority over another entity during a past time period.
-
C.
historicalCounty
Indicates that an entity was located within or associated with a county as it existed in the past, even if that county’s boundaries or administrative status have since changed.
-
D.
countyJurisdiction
Indicates that one entity (typically a government body or authority) has legal or administrative jurisdiction over a specific county.
-
E.
historicCountyOverlap
Indicates that two areas share a common portion of territory within the boundaries of the same historic county.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efd6b76f8c8190a7ba908aca280942 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe066d62b48190867df334039be786 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe03afde3c8190a5b9b0778d19eb1a |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:54 a.m.