Triple
T28455119
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Louisiana’s 1st congressional district |
E716688
|
entity |
| Predicate | redrawnAfterCensus |
P12503
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2010 United States Census |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2010 United States Census | Statement: [Louisiana’s 1st congressional district, redrawnAfterCensus, 2010 United States Census]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: redrawnAfterCensus Context triple: [Louisiana’s 1st congressional district, redrawnAfterCensus, 2010 United States Census]
-
A.
redistrictedBy
Indicates that an entity’s boundaries or districts have been altered or redefined by another specified agent or authority.
-
B.
redistrictedAfter
chosen
Indicates that one districting arrangement or boundary configuration was created or implemented following, and typically as a result of, another districting arrangement.
-
C.
redistrictedIn
Indicates that the boundaries or jurisdiction of an area have been changed or reassigned within a specified district or administrative division.
-
D.
redistrictedEvery
Indicates that a redistricting process has been applied to all relevant areas or units within a given scope.
-
E.
reapportionedAfter
Indicates that one entity’s allocation, distribution, or representation has been adjusted or reassigned as a consequence of another prior allocation event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efd6b76f8c8190a7ba908aca280942 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f64e755ed881908d21ccffc9a81486 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f64caede108190a35cc7cbfead866f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:53 a.m.