Triple
T28450400
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gasforth |
E716561
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFictionalCharacteristic |
P58963
|
FINISHED |
| Object | small community |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: small community | Statement: [Gasforth, hasFictionalCharacteristic, small community]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFictionalCharacteristic Context triple: [Gasforth, hasFictionalCharacteristic, small community]
-
A.
hasFictionalProperty
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses a property, attribute, or characteristic that exists only in a fictional or imaginary context.
-
B.
hasFictionalType
Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified under a particular type or category that is fictional rather than real.
-
C.
hasFictionalFunction
Indicates that an entity serves a role, purpose, or function within a fictional context or narrative.
-
D.
isFictionalCharacter
Indicates that the subject is a character that exists only in fiction rather than in real life.
-
E.
hasFictionalForm
Indicates that an entity has a counterpart or representation that exists within a fictional or imaginary context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efd6b76f8c8190a7ba908aca280942 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd37b695c88190855801626f91c4cd |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd374cccf08190a230e87164af5938 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:51 a.m.