Triple
T28439954
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sinfonía No. 4 |
E715679
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCataloguedComposer |
P153199
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Carlos Chávez |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Carlos Chávez | Statement: [Sinfonía No. 4, hasCataloguedComposer, Carlos Chávez]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCataloguedComposer Context triple: [Sinfonía No. 4, hasCataloguedComposer, Carlos Chávez]
-
A.
hasMusicalComposer
Indicates that one entity serves as the musical composer responsible for creating the music associated with another entity.
-
B.
catalogueOfComposer
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a catalogue that systematically lists or documents the works of a particular composer.
-
C.
hasKnownComposer
Indicates that the work is associated with a composer whose identity is known and specified.
-
D.
hasNotableComposer
Indicates that an entity is associated with a composer who is recognized as particularly significant or distinguished.
-
E.
notableComposerOfType
Indicates that an entity is a well-known or distinguished composer associated with a specified type, category, or genre of composition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efd6b44550819094ae991b553d9fc3 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fccdd496048190bca801a8a9eecb62 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcccee6240819084680887731ff64b |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:45 a.m.