Triple

T28437335
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject State of California v. Robert Durst E715302 entity
Predicate specialCircumstanceFound P171459 FINISHED
Object lying in wait LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lying in wait | Statement: [State of California v. Robert Durst, specialCircumstanceFound, lying in wait]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: specialCircumstanceFound
Context triple: [State of California v. Robert Durst, specialCircumstanceFound, lying in wait]
  • A. specialCaseOf
    Indicates that one entity represents a more specific, exceptional, or restricted instance of the general situation, rule, or relationship expressed by another entity.
  • B. specialRuleDetail
    Indicates that there is additional, specific information or conditions associated with a special rule in the relationship or action.
  • C. specialAppearance
    Indicates that an entity makes a notable or exceptional appearance distinct from its usual or regular presence.
  • D. reasonForSpecialMeasures
    Indicates that one entity specifies the justification or cause for which special measures or exceptional actions are taken regarding another entity.
  • E. specialValue
    Indicates that an entity possesses a distinguished or exceptional value compared to typical or default values in the given context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69efd6b253888190b3c7222ed6a403a8 completed April 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f69f80b62c8190bf2af2be0d3a7df8 completed May 3, 2026, 1:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f69d17e8d48190b30bcc2f4bd81eb2 completed May 3, 2026, 12:55 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f69edae2448190925ce701c8792c52 completed May 3, 2026, 1:03 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:43 a.m.