Triple
T28437334
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | State of California v. Robert Durst |
E715302
|
entity |
| Predicate | verdictOnCharge |
P9727
|
FINISHED |
| Object | guilty of first-degree murder |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: guilty of first-degree murder | Statement: [State of California v. Robert Durst, verdictOnCharge, guilty of first-degree murder]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: verdictOnCharge Context triple: [State of California v. Robert Durst, verdictOnCharge, guilty of first-degree murder]
-
A.
verdict
chosen
Indicates the formal decision or judgment reached and declared at the conclusion of a legal or evaluative process.
-
B.
resultOfAccusation
Indicates that one entity is the outcome, consequence, or product of an accusation made by another entity.
-
C.
convictedBy
Indicates that an authority, typically a court or judge, has formally found an entity guilty of a crime or offense.
-
D.
judgmentResult
Indicates the outcome or decision produced by a judgment, such as a court ruling, evaluation, or formal assessment, regarding the entities involved.
-
E.
indictmentIssued
Indicates that formal criminal charges have been officially filed against an individual or entity by a legal authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efd6b253888190b3c7222ed6a403a8 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f64e3b35fc819096c20346642c2a38 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f64caede108190a35cc7cbfead866f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:43 a.m.