Triple
T28433856
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Love Sosa |
E715207
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasChantHook |
P69675
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Love Sosa, hasChantHook, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChantHook Context triple: [Love Sosa, hasChantHook, true]
-
A.
hasChantStyleHook
chosen
Indicates that something possesses or is associated with a specific chant-style hook as a characteristic or feature.
-
B.
hasChant
Indicates that an entity is associated with or characterized by a particular chant.
-
C.
hasChorusHook
Indicates that a musical work features a prominent, recurring chorus section that serves as a memorable hook.
-
D.
hasChantingStyle
Indicates that an entity is associated with or characterized by a particular style or manner of chanting.
-
E.
hasSpokenChants
Indicates that an entity has uttered or recited ritualistic or formulaic chants, typically as part of a ceremonial, religious, or magical practice.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efd6b253888190b3c7222ed6a403a8 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f75dc25fa08190b371faf36d9fb72c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f758586534819083e91172f4bf5098 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:14 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:41 a.m.