Triple

T2841926
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ijesha E62488 entity
Predicate sharesLanguageFamilyWith P33593 FINISHED
Object other Yoruba dialects LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: other Yoruba dialects | Statement: [Ijesha, sharesLanguageFamilyWith, other Yoruba dialects]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sharesLanguageFamilyWith
Context triple: [Ijesha, sharesLanguageFamilyWith, other Yoruba dialects]
  • A. areOfficialLanguageFamilyOf
    Indicates that one or more language families hold official status within, or are formally recognized as official for, a particular entity (such as a country or region).
  • B. sharesLanguageWith chosen
    Indicates that two entities use at least one common language for communication.
  • C. languageFamilyAssociated
    Indicates that there is an association or connection between a language and a particular language family.
  • D. derivedFromLanguageFamily
    Indicates that one language originates from, or historically descends from, a particular language family.
  • E. influencedLanguageFamily
    Indicates that one language family has had a significant impact on the development, structure, or usage of another language family.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4c3d16bc81908b3a1c98fbd287fe completed March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abdf16d0c08190bb8de4a4160b4414 completed March 7, 2026, 8:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abdd0e86808190bcefffafbd3cd441 completed March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 10:01 p.m.