Triple

T28416897
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mazurkas (Chopin) E719830 entity
Predicate keyVariety P164475 FINISHED
Object various major and minor keys LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: various major and minor keys | Statement: [Mazurkas (Chopin), keyVariety, various major and minor keys]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: keyVariety
Context triple: [Mazurkas (Chopin), keyVariety, various major and minor keys]
  • A. keyType
    Indicates the classification or category of a key in relation to how it is used or defined within a system or context.
  • B. keys
    Indicates that one entity serves as a key (or set of keys) that can open, access, or control another entity.
  • C. key
    Indicates that one entity functions as a key (literal or metaphorical) that unlocks, enables access to, or provides a crucial solution or control over another entity.
  • D. keyCustom
    Indicates that something has a user-defined or non-standard key used for identification, access, or configuration.
  • E. keyExample
    Indicates that something serves as a representative or illustrative instance of a key concept, feature, or case.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eff6f1c5088190bc24bfbf92f9c017 completed April 27, 2026, 11:53 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f64dc18ab081908ea8baa9edec31e2 completed May 2, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f641e2f1708190b45b48d6a43c51d2 completed May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f64bca8574819095e081cbb7e2f369 completed May 2, 2026, 7:08 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:31 a.m.