Triple
T28410798
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | legatus Augusti pro praetore |
E719655
|
entity |
| Predicate | couldCommand |
P165153
|
FINISHED |
| Object | auxiliary units |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: auxiliary units | Statement: [legatus Augusti pro praetore, couldCommand, auxiliary units]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: couldCommand Context triple: [legatus Augusti pro praetore, couldCommand, auxiliary units]
-
A.
commandedBy
Indicates that one entity holds authoritative control or issues orders over another entity.
-
B.
coCommandedWith
Indicates that two or more entities shared command authority together over the same unit, operation, or context during a given period.
-
C.
commandedTo
Indicates that one entity has issued an order or directive for another entity to perform a specific action or fulfill a particular duty.
-
D.
centralCommand
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary controlling or coordinating authority over the operations, decisions, or activities of another entity or group.
-
E.
commandOf
Indicates that one entity holds authoritative control or leadership over another, typically in a military, organizational, or hierarchical context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eff6f0f37c8190b37bc6fab08a9449 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 11:53 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f65705a3048190a3728b695ba2ae65 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f651a931748190a637e631a52bbfaa |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6562ef4e4819082ce6abd41b74dc5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:26 a.m.