Triple
T28402347
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Neolithic period |
E719423
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasKeyInnovation |
P48898
|
FINISHED |
| Object | plant cultivation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: plant cultivation | Statement: [Neolithic period, hasKeyInnovation, plant cultivation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasKeyInnovation Context triple: [Neolithic period, hasKeyInnovation, plant cultivation]
-
A.
hasKeyInvention
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a primary or crucial invention.
-
B.
hasInnovationType
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or classified by, a specific type or category of innovation.
-
C.
hasInnovationStatus
Indicates that an entity holds a particular classification or state regarding its level, type, or stage of innovation.
-
D.
hasNotableInnovation
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant, distinguishing innovation or breakthrough.
-
E.
innovationLevel
Indicates the degree or extent to which something is new, original, or creatively advanced compared to existing norms or solutions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eff6efd1b08190ae3cefd4f11388a2 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 11:53 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b49436b0819094e21603054d05d4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b3a5fd8481909433e923c5e24e55 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:21 a.m.