Triple
T28400332
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Synchronous Digital Hierarchy |
E719378
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsProtectionScheme |
P198182
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ring protection |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ring protection | Statement: [Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, supportsProtectionScheme, ring protection]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsProtectionScheme Context triple: [Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, supportsProtectionScheme, ring protection]
-
A.
supportedByScheme
chosen
Indicates that something is backed, enabled, or made possible by a particular scheme, framework, or structured plan.
-
B.
protectionType
Indicates the kind or method of protection that is applied to or associated with an entity.
-
C.
hasPrincipalProtection
Indicates that an investment or financial product guarantees the return of the original principal amount, protecting it from loss.
-
D.
supportsBalanceProtection
Indicates that an entity provides or enables a balance protection feature that safeguards an account’s or position’s value against certain losses or negative changes.
-
E.
protectionPolicy
Indicates that one entity establishes or enforces rules or measures to safeguard another entity from harm, loss, or risk.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69eff6efd1b08190ae3cefd4f11388a2 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 11:53 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00a094c44c81908e4501151688a635 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a009fcdfd848190841deaad9667d347 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:10 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:19 a.m.