Triple

T2839344
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bien de Interés Cultural (Colombia) E62425 entity
Predicate protectedAspect P42951 FINISHED
Object material integrity of the property LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: material integrity of the property | Statement: [Bien de Interés Cultural (Colombia), protectedAspect, material integrity of the property]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: protectedAspect
Context triple: [Bien de Interés Cultural (Colombia), protectedAspect, material integrity of the property]
  • A. protectedAs
    Indicates that one entity is safeguarded, preserved, or kept safe by another entity or under a specified protective status or mechanism.
  • B. protectedFor
    Indicates that something is safeguarded or preserved specifically for the benefit, use, or rights of a particular entity or purpose.
  • C. protectedBy
    Indicates that one entity provides protection, defense, or safeguarding for another entity.
  • D. protectedEntity
    Indicates that one entity is safeguarded or defended by another entity or mechanism.
  • E. protectedIn
    Indicates that one entity is safeguarded, preserved, or kept safe within the context, environment, or jurisdiction of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4c3d16bc81908b3a1c98fbd287fe completed March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abdef145f08190be8556bc696ba3ab completed March 7, 2026, 8:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abdd0ce8b08190ba28c192988f38ce completed March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abde4895dc819097c396c5d31ac1d1 completed March 7, 2026, 8:14 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 10:01 p.m.