Triple

T28392872
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New Jersey legislative redistricting E719201 entity
Predicate considersCriterion P159074 FINISHED
Object contiguity of districts LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: contiguity of districts | Statement: [New Jersey legislative redistricting, considersCriterion, contiguity of districts]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: considersCriterion
Context triple: [New Jersey legislative redistricting, considersCriterion, contiguity of districts]
  • A. proposesCriterion
    Indicates that one entity suggests or puts forward a specific criterion to be considered or used by another entity or within a given context.
  • B. valueCriterion
    Indicates that something is evaluated or selected based on a specified standard, rule, or measure of value.
  • C. establishesCriterion
    Indicates that an entity defines or sets a standard, rule, or condition by which another entity is to be judged, selected, or evaluated.
  • D. hasComparisonCriterion
    Indicates that one entity is used as the basis or standard by which another entity is compared or evaluated.
  • E. recognizedCriterion chosen
    Indicates that something is acknowledged or accepted as a valid standard, measure, or basis for judgment in a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eff6ef211081909d31d9be5f5567e6 completed April 27, 2026, 11:53 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f65a6c900881908f18b61273d7bf8d completed May 2, 2026, 8:11 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f659ce58408190ba9e007b4810d4d0 completed May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:14 a.m.