Triple
T2838790
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Piast dynasty |
E62413
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Oleśnica Piasts
Oleśnica Piasts were a cadet branch of the Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Oleśnica in Silesia during the Middle Ages.
|
E322915
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Oleśnica Piasts | Statement: [Piast dynasty, hasPart, Oleśnica Piasts]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Oleśnica Piasts Context triple: [Piast dynasty, hasPart, Oleśnica Piasts]
-
A.
Racibórz Piasts
The Racibórz Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s medieval Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Racibórz in Silesia.
-
B.
Głogów Piasts
Głogów Piasts were a regional branch of the medieval Polish Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Głogów and surrounding Silesian territories.
-
C.
Żagań Piasts
Żagań Piasts were a Silesian branch of the medieval Polish Piast royal dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Żagań.
-
D.
Świdnica-Jawor Piasts
The Świdnica-Jawor Piasts were a regional branch of the Piast dynasty that ruled the Silesian duchies of Świdnica and Jawor during the Middle Ages.
-
E.
Opole Piasts
The Opole Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Opole and surrounding Silesian territories during the Middle Ages.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Oleśnica Piasts Triple: [Piast dynasty, hasPart, Oleśnica Piasts]
Generated description
Oleśnica Piasts were a cadet branch of the Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Oleśnica in Silesia during the Middle Ages.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Oleśnica Piasts Target entity description: Oleśnica Piasts were a cadet branch of the Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Oleśnica in Silesia during the Middle Ages.
-
A.
Racibórz Piasts
The Racibórz Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s medieval Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Racibórz in Silesia.
-
B.
Głogów Piasts
Głogów Piasts were a regional branch of the medieval Polish Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Głogów and surrounding Silesian territories.
-
C.
Żagań Piasts
Żagań Piasts were a Silesian branch of the medieval Polish Piast royal dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Żagań.
-
D.
Świdnica-Jawor Piasts
The Świdnica-Jawor Piasts were a regional branch of the Piast dynasty that ruled the Silesian duchies of Świdnica and Jawor during the Middle Ages.
-
E.
Opole Piasts
The Opole Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Opole and surrounding Silesian territories during the Middle Ages.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4c3d16bc81908b3a1c98fbd287fe |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdef015bc81909f6a2ff17b22862f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:16 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b1eed55b6481909e9338314a94b5d0 |
completed | March 11, 2026, 10:38 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69b1f041beac8190879a180e825e4d37 |
completed | March 11, 2026, 10:44 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69b1f095116c819088edd8ed7ce86b5a |
completed | March 11, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 10:01 p.m.