Triple

T2837959
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Battle of Kolberg (1945) E62394 entity
Predicate defensiveStatus P8412 FINISHED
Object fortress city LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fortress city | Statement: [Battle of Kolberg (1945), defensiveStatus, fortress city]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defensiveStatus
Context triple: [Battle of Kolberg (1945), defensiveStatus, fortress city]
  • A. defensiveRole
    Indicates that an entity serves a protective or guarding function in relation to another entity or context.
  • B. canBeDefendedIn
    Indicates that something (such as a claim, action, or position) is capable of being justified or supported within a specified context, forum, or framework.
  • C. defensiveStructure chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity functions as a structure built or used to protect, defend, or fortify another entity or area.
  • D. defensivePlan
    Indicates a relationship where an entity formulates or adopts a strategy specifically intended to protect against threats, attacks, or other adverse actions.
  • E. defensiveTask
    Indicates a task in which an entity protects, guards, or defends another entity or resource from potential threats or harm.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4c3d16bc81908b3a1c98fbd287fe completed March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abdef015bc81909f6a2ff17b22862f completed March 7, 2026, 8:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abdd0ce8b08190ba28c192988f38ce completed March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 10:01 p.m.