Triple

T28296186
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject CBASIC E713577 entity
Predicate programmingLanguageParadigm P49316 FINISHED
Object procedural programming LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: procedural programming | Statement: [CBASIC, programmingLanguageParadigm, procedural programming]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: programmingLanguageParadigm
Context triple: [CBASIC, programmingLanguageParadigm, procedural programming]
  • A. languageParadigm chosen
    Indicates a relationship where a programming language follows, supports, or is categorized under a particular programming paradigm.
  • B. programmingLanguage
    Indicates that one entity is a programming language used to create, control, or interact with the other entity.
  • C. programmingParadigmWorkedOn
    Indicates that an entity has worked on or been involved with a particular programming paradigm.
  • D. programLanguage
    Indicates that an entity is implemented, written, or expressed using a particular programming language.
  • E. softwareParadigm
    Indicates that a piece of software or a programming language follows or is based on a particular programming paradigm or style of development.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69efb524ab688190a1ce7ee7c9520932 completed April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f67c9fe7b48190b79b4041357edb49 completed May 2, 2026, 10:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f678cc272081909e5c70f1bc7407f0 completed May 2, 2026, 10:21 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:32 p.m.