Triple

T28288293
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Guang E713347 entity
Predicate associatedDynastyThroughBearer P203106 FINISHED
Object Song dynasty NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Song dynasty | Statement: [Guang, associatedDynastyThroughBearer, Song dynasty]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedDynastyThroughBearer
Context triple: [Guang, associatedDynastyThroughBearer, Song dynasty]
  • A. associatedWithDynasty
    Indicates that an entity has a historical, political, cultural, or familial connection to a specific dynasty.
  • B. associatedDynasticOrder
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, or formally connected with, a particular dynastic order.
  • C. associatedWithDynastyFoundation
    Indicates a relationship in which an entity is connected to the founding or establishment of a particular dynasty.
  • D. regentDynasty
    Indicates that one entity served as the ruling dynasty or regent house governing on behalf of another entity (such as a realm, monarch, or territory).
  • E. belongsToDynasticHistory
    Indicates that something is part of, or associated with, a particular dynastic historical period or lineage.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69efb52371d88190a1381c4e58a3b731 completed April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a0120f070b081909b6d1a3d8ee6b80e completed May 11, 2026, 12:21 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a01209da37481909683e38f264b15ef completed May 11, 2026, 12:19 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a0120ef753c81909894e53013b33f03 completed May 11, 2026, 12:21 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:27 p.m.