Triple

T28279619
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Huasteca culture E713103 entity
Predicate hadDeitiesInCommonWith P32474 FINISHED
Object other Mesoamerican cultures LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: other Mesoamerican cultures | Statement: [Huasteca culture, hadDeitiesInCommonWith, other Mesoamerican cultures]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadDeitiesInCommonWith
Context triple: [Huasteca culture, hadDeitiesInCommonWith, other Mesoamerican cultures]
  • A. sharesDeitiesWith chosen
    Indicates that two entities have one or more deities in common within their respective religious or mythological systems.
  • B. comparableDeity
    Indicates that one deity is considered comparable to another in terms of role, attributes, status, or function.
  • C. worshippedAlongside
    Indicates that two deities or sacred figures were venerated together within the same religious context, ritual, or cult practice.
  • D. hasNumberOfDeities
    Indicates the specific count of deities associated with an entity, such as a religion, mythology, or belief system.
  • E. hasSiblingDeity
    Indicates that one deity is a sibling (sharing at least one parent) of another deity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69efb52275788190ae5181ccebef18ce completed April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6444ef12481909d3c98e5d5660117 completed May 2, 2026, 6:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f641e0fde08190bf06a1c5b388aa84 completed May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:21 p.m.