Triple
T28263921
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Google Buzz |
E712651
|
entity |
| Predicate | privacyControversy |
P131056
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Google Buzz, privacyControversy, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: privacyControversy Context triple: [Google Buzz, privacyControversy, yes]
-
A.
privacyProperty
Indicates that one entity has a characteristic, rule, or condition specifically related to privacy in the context of the relationship.
-
B.
privacyCharacteristic
Indicates the specific privacy-related property or feature that characterizes how information is handled, protected, or exposed in a given context.
-
C.
dataControversy
chosen
Indicates that there is dispute, concern, or disagreement surrounding the collection, use, interpretation, or ownership of certain data.
-
D.
controversy
Indicates a situation in which there is active disagreement, dispute, or public debate between parties over a particular issue, action, or claim.
-
E.
soughtPrivacy
Indicates that an entity intentionally attempted to obtain or maintain privacy from others.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efb5216c6881908020dce4aea65381 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f64e37f7fc819083809149b6661e3c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f64caede108190a35cc7cbfead866f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:13 p.m.