Triple
T28251562
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Campanus of Novara |
E712322
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasInfluentialEditionOf |
P3094
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Euclid’s Elements |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Euclid’s Elements | Statement: [Campanus of Novara, hasInfluentialEditionOf, Euclid’s Elements]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInfluentialEditionOf Context triple: [Campanus of Novara, hasInfluentialEditionOf, Euclid’s Elements]
-
A.
hasEditionIn
Indicates that one entity has a specific edition or version that exists or is available in another entity (such as a particular format, language, or location).
-
B.
isLargestEditionOf
Indicates that one edition of a work is the largest among all its editions, typically in terms of size, volume, or content.
-
C.
hasEditionRelationship
Indicates a relationship where one resource is an edition or version of another, linking different manifestations of essentially the same work.
-
D.
notableEdition
chosen
Indicates that a particular edition or version of a work is especially significant or noteworthy in relation to that work.
-
E.
hasEditionRole
Indicates that an entity holds a specific editorial role or responsibility in relation to a particular edition of a work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efb5207eb08190827e4c34048030b1 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd783fed9c81909e792702636c4f1f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd7788e63c81909de22fdafcfe41c0 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:05 p.m.