Triple
T28250934
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Epinomis |
E712309
|
entity |
| Predicate | possiblyAuthoredBy |
P4244
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Philip of Opus |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Philip of Opus | Statement: [Epinomis, possiblyAuthoredBy, Philip of Opus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: possiblyAuthoredBy Context triple: [Epinomis, possiblyAuthoredBy, Philip of Opus]
-
A.
hasAuthorOf
Indicates that one entity is the author or creator of another entity (such as a work, document, or publication).
-
B.
hasAuthor
chosen
Indicates that an entity is written or created by a specific author.
-
C.
mayAuthor
Indicates that an entity has the potential or permission to be the author of another entity (such as a work or document).
-
D.
possiblyOwnedBy
Indicates that an entity may be owned or possessed by another entity, but the ownership is uncertain or not definitively established.
-
E.
authorizedOn
Indicates that an entity has been granted official permission or rights to act, access, or operate on a specified object, resource, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efb51fb98881909692421959ec0170 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68805b4848190b75da14996d52a38 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f68609c0b08190a8e1238a4d97c270 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:04 p.m.