Triple
T28250929
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Epinomis |
E712309
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ancient philosophical dialogue |
C1211
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: ancient philosophical dialogue Context triple: [Epinomis, instanceOf, ancient philosophical dialogue]
-
A.
Platonic dialogue
chosen
A Platonic dialogue is a philosophical text, typically featuring Socrates, in which ideas are explored through question-and-answer conversations that probe definitions, assumptions, and the nature of knowledge and virtue.
-
B.
Platonic dialogue character
A Platonic dialogue character is a fictional or semi-fictional interlocutor used by Plato to voice, question, or challenge philosophical ideas within a structured conversational setting.
-
C.
Upanishadic dialogue
An Upanishadic dialogue is a philosophical conversation, often between teacher and student, that explores the nature of reality, self, and ultimate truth in the ancient Indian Upanishads.
-
D.
part of philosophical dialogue
A part of philosophical dialogue is a discrete segment of conversation in which interlocutors exchange arguments, questions, or reflections that collectively advance the exploration of a philosophical issue.
-
E.
Vedic philosophical debate
Vedic philosophical debate is a rigorous, dialogical method of inquiry in the Indian tradition where scholars analyze and challenge interpretations of the Vedas and related texts to clarify metaphysical, ethical, and spiritual truths.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efb51fb98881909692421959ec0170 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:04 p.m.