Triple

T28250338
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Myth of Er E712294 entity
Predicate includesMoralExemplar P44622 FINISHED
Object Odysseus NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Odysseus | Statement: [Myth of Er, includesMoralExemplar, Odysseus]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesMoralExemplar
Context triple: [Myth of Er, includesMoralExemplar, Odysseus]
  • A. moralExemplarOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a model or standard of moral behavior for another entity or group.
  • B. hasMoralCharacteristic
    Indicates that an entity possesses a particular moral quality, trait, or ethical attribute.
  • C. moralPortrayal
    Indicates how an entity is depicted in terms of moral qualities, such as virtue, vice, or ethical standing, within a given context.
  • D. hasMoralPerspective
    Indicates that an entity holds or applies a particular moral or ethical viewpoint in evaluating actions, situations, or other entities.
  • E. hasMoralComplexity
    Indicates that the relationship or action involves nuanced ethical considerations, conflicting values, or ambiguity in determining what is morally right or wrong.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69efb51fb98881909692421959ec0170 completed April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fed48d8e148190a99c0aea29f8a3ee completed May 9, 2026, 6:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fed3c82a24819095e614e31ac0307f completed May 9, 2026, 6:27 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:04 p.m.