Triple
T28248551
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Best of All Possible Worlds |
E712252
|
entity |
| Predicate | famouslySatirizedIn |
P161912
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Candide |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Candide | Statement: [The Best of All Possible Worlds, famouslySatirizedIn, Candide]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: famouslySatirizedIn Context triple: [The Best of All Possible Worlds, famouslySatirizedIn, Candide]
-
A.
satirizedBy
chosen
Indicates that the subject is the target or object of satire created or performed by the specified entity.
-
B.
hasHumorousTreatmentOf
Indicates that one entity presents or portrays another entity in a humorous, comedic, or joking manner.
-
C.
hasNotableSatire
Indicates that one entity is recognized for containing or exemplifying a significant satirical treatment of the other entity.
-
D.
parodies
Indicates that one entity imitates another in an exaggerated or humorous way, often to criticize or comment on the original.
-
E.
politicalIdeologyParodies
Indicates a relationship where one entity creates or embodies a parody that humorously imitates, critiques, or exaggerates another entity’s political ideology.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efb51fb98881909692421959ec0170 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6562fd3488190be1acd8c526a28d2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f651a931748190a637e631a52bbfaa |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 11:03 p.m.