Triple
T28240031
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Katherine Hewitt |
E711996
|
entity |
| Predicate | prosecutionType |
P25382
|
FINISHED |
| Object | witchcraft prosecution |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: witchcraft prosecution | Statement: [Katherine Hewitt, prosecutionType, witchcraft prosecution]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: prosecutionType Context triple: [Katherine Hewitt, prosecutionType, witchcraft prosecution]
-
A.
prosecuted
Indicates that legal authorities have formally brought criminal charges against an entity and pursued a case against them in a court of law.
-
B.
subjectOfProsecution
Indicates that an entity is the target or focus of a legal prosecution or criminal proceeding initiated by an authority.
-
C.
prosecutorialStatement
Indicates that a statement is made by a prosecutor in the context of a legal or criminal proceeding.
-
D.
typeOfProceedings
chosen
Indicates the specific category or kind of legal or formal process under which an action or case is being conducted.
-
E.
prosecutingAuthority
Indicates that an entity serves as the official body responsible for bringing and conducting legal proceedings against another party in a criminal or regulatory case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efb51ece308190b8c269a057e36652 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f643c49d5081908fd9260a0280caaa |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f641e0fde08190bf06a1c5b388aa84 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 10:57 p.m.