Triple

T28236721
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Conservative Party (advisor, not member of Parliament) E711899 entity
Predicate roleEmphasizes P268 FINISHED
Object backroom strategist LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: backroom strategist | Statement: [Conservative Party (advisor, not member of Parliament), roleEmphasizes, backroom strategist]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleEmphasizes
Context triple: [Conservative Party (advisor, not member of Parliament), roleEmphasizes, backroom strategist]
  • A. socialRoleEmphasis
    Indicates an emphasis on or prioritization of a particular social role within a relationship or interaction.
  • B. role chosen
    Indicates the function, position, or responsibility that one entity holds in relation to another within a given context.
  • C. rolePurpose
    Indicates the intended function, objective, or responsibility that a given role is meant to fulfill.
  • D. roleInText
    Indicates that an entity participates in a text with a specific function or capacity (e.g., author, editor, character).
  • E. roleAccordingTo
    Indicates that an entity holds a particular role or function as defined or interpreted by a specified source or perspective.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69efb51ece308190b8c269a057e36652 completed April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f643c204508190a43fe0ec5165b01c completed May 2, 2026, 6:34 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f641e0fde08190bf06a1c5b388aa84 completed May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 10:55 p.m.