Triple

T28219305
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject G. Simmons E711405 entity
Predicate namingConnectionType P164133 FINISHED
Object familial or commemorative naming connection LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: familial or commemorative naming connection | Statement: [G. Simmons, namingConnectionType, familial or commemorative naming connection]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: namingConnectionType
Context triple: [G. Simmons, namingConnectionType, familial or commemorative naming connection]
  • A. connectorTypeDesignation
    Indicates the specific type or classification assigned to a connector within a connection or interface relationship.
  • B. commonConnectorName
    Indicates that two or more entities share the same connector name used to link or interface them.
  • C. connectorType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of connection interface that links two entities.
  • D. namingConventionType
    Indicates the specific style or set of rules used for naming entities or elements in a given context.
  • E. connectionEstablishmentMethod
    Indicates the method or mechanism by which a connection between entities is initiated or established.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69efb51cb5288190818c1f63a266af11 completed April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6434f9f888190bd43fde92cd729fe completed May 2, 2026, 6:32 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f63c6c1a948190b68c0f92c264cc0c completed May 2, 2026, 6:03 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f63fd4f7448190930c723ba7cfce62 completed May 2, 2026, 6:17 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 10:45 p.m.