Triple
T28215017
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Women of Troy |
E711287
|
entity |
| Predicate | brandingCategory |
P165738
|
FINISHED |
| Object | collegiate sports brand |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: collegiate sports brand | Statement: [Women of Troy, brandingCategory, collegiate sports brand]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: brandingCategory Context triple: [Women of Troy, brandingCategory, collegiate sports brand]
-
A.
brandingFeature
Indicates that one entity serves as a branding-related characteristic, element, or attribute that helps define or distinguish another entity’s brand identity.
-
B.
brandingNote
Indicates that an entity has an associated note or comment specifically about its branding, such as style, usage, or presentation guidelines.
-
C.
brandingReplaced
Indicates that one branding has been superseded or substituted by another branding.
-
D.
brandingStyle
Indicates the specific visual and stylistic approach used to represent a brand’s identity.
-
E.
brandingAuthority
Indicates that one entity has the recognized power or right to define, control, or approve the branding (name, logo, identity, or brand usage) of another entity or product.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efb51cb5288190818c1f63a266af11 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f65b14512c8190a40e70319dcc54cd |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f659ce58408190ba9e007b4810d4d0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f65a6babcc81908052c9907a99c882 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 10:42 p.m.