Triple

T28211654
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Système pratique et raisonné de représentation proportionnelle E711183 entity
Predicate citationSubject P164130 FINISHED
Object comparative electoral systems literature LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: comparative electoral systems literature | Statement: [Système pratique et raisonné de représentation proportionnelle, citationSubject, comparative electoral systems literature]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: citationSubject
Context triple: [Système pratique et raisonné de représentation proportionnelle, citationSubject, comparative electoral systems literature]
  • A. citationSubject chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the subject or topic being cited or referenced by another entity.
  • B. citationOf
    Indicates that one entity cites, references, or formally acknowledges another entity as a source.
  • C. citationType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of citation relationship that one entity has to another (e.g., reference, quotation, acknowledgment).
  • D. citationBy
    Indicates that one work is cited or referenced by another work.
  • E. citationIn
    Indicates that one work cites, references, or otherwise acknowledges another work as a source.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69efb51cb5288190818c1f63a266af11 completed April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f64312f0f081909d8cb61e9cd52b16 completed May 2, 2026, 6:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f641e0fde08190bf06a1c5b388aa84 completed May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 10:39 p.m.